Evaluation of the Implementation of the Sekolah Penggerak Program at Kandis 5 Junior High School, Kandis District, Siak Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijetr.v2i4.281Keywords:
Program Evaluation, CIPP Model, Driving School ProgramAbstract
This study assesses the implementation of the Sekolah Penggerak Program at Kandis 5 Junior High School using the CIPP evaluation model. A qualitative approach was used, gathering primary data through observations, interviews, and secondary data from documents like teaching modules and school reports. The results indicate the program aligns with the school’s goals, with adequate planning, resources, and infrastructure, though internet connectivity remains a challenge. The program has positively influenced the learning environment, enhancing teacher competence, student outcomes, and character development. However, continuous evaluation is essential to ensure the program's sustained success and achievement of its objectives.
References
Abror, M. D., & Pramono, T. (2024). Implementasi Kepmedikbudristek RI Nomor 162/M/2021 tentang program sekolah penggerak di SMPN 1 Pace kabupaten nganjuk. Jurnal Interaksi: Jurnal Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 24-37.
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2008). Evaluation of education programs: Practical theoretical guidance for students and education practitioners (4th ed.). PT. Bumi Aksara.
Bella, S., Nadeak, D. R. H., Rasuna, M. A., & Simamora, C. M. (2024). Case method learning in implementing Pancasila values. Holistic Science, 4(2), 205-209.
Ismail. (2014). Educational evaluation. Tunas Gemilang.
Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M. S., Stufflebeam, D. L., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation.
Maryati, R., Sukmawati, S., & Radiana, U. (2023). Evaluating the Sekolah Penggerak Program using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Model at SMA Negeri 5 Sungai Raya, Kubu Raya District. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(5), 238-249.
Moleong, L. J. (2011). Qualitative research methodology (29th ed.). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muharika, D. (2019). Program evaluation research methodology. Alfabeta.
Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Program evaluation models in evaluation research.Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas (Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 3(1).
Patilima, S. (2022, January). Sekolah Penggerak as an effort to improve education quality. In Proceedings of the National Seminar on Primary Education.
Ritonga, A. A., Lubis, Y. W., Masitha, S., & Harahap, C. P. (2022). The sekolah penggerak program as an innovation to improve the quality of education at SD Negeri 104267 Pegajahan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 31(2), 195-206.
Santosa, A. B. (2025). Evaluating the implementation of the Sekolah Penggerak Program at SDIT Salsabila 3 Banguntapan Bantul. Elementary School: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran ke-SD-an, 12(1), 114-125.
Sudiono, A. (1996). Introduction to educational evaluation. RajaGrafindo.
Suttrisno, S., Yulia, N. M., & Fithriyah, D. N. (2022). Developing teacher competencies in carrying out learning evaluations in the Merdeka Belajar era. ZAHRA: Research and Thought Elementary School of Islam Journal, 3(1), 52-60.
Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2000). Program Evaluation. PT. Rineka Cipta.
Widodo, H. (2021). Evaluasi Pendidikan. UAD PRESS.
Yusuf, A. M. (2014). Research Methods: Quantitative, Qualitative and Combined Research. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Zulaiha, S., Meisin, M., & Meldina, T. (2023). The issues faced by teachers in implementing the Merdeka Belajar curriculum. Terampil: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 9(2), 163-177.
Zulkarnaen, Z., Mukhlis, M., & Abdullah, J. (2024). Merdeka Belajar Episode 7: Sekolah Penggerak. Journal on Education, 6(2), 11260-11267.
