Customary Law In Conflict Mitigation Within Families, Communities And Spiritual Entities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijarss.v3i1.160Keywords:
Customary Law, Community Conflict, Conflict MitigationAbstract
Community conflict is not seen as an isolated phenomenon, but rather as a disruption to the broader social and cosmological balance. The purpose of this research is to show that the process of community conflict resolution often involves not only the parties directly involved in the dispute, but also families, communities, and even spiritual entities that are believed to have a role in maintaining harmony. The qualitative research used a descriptive approach to collect data systematically, factually, and quickly according to the picture when the research was conducted. The results of this study show that facing this challenge, there needs to be an integration effort between customary mediation and the national legal system. The government can play a role in recognizing and validating the results of customary mediation as part of legitimate dispute resolution.
References
Adiputra, I. G. N. A. (2018). Implementasi Desa Wisata Berkelanjutan (Studi Kasus: Desa Wisata Penglipuran, Kabupaten Bangli). Jurnal Master Pariwisata (JUMPA), 5(1), 91-110.
Bedner, A., & Van Huis, S. (2008). The return of the native in Indonesian law: Indigenous communities in Indonesian legislation. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land-en volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 164(2/3), 165-193.
Benda-Beckmann, F. von. (2013). Property in social continuity: Continuity and change in the maintenance of property relationships through time in Minangkabau, West Sumatra. Springer Science & Business Media.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological applications, 10(5), 1251-1262.
Bowen, J. R. (2003). Islam, law, and equality in Indonesia: An anthropology of public reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Dyson, L. E., Grant, S., & Hendriks, M. (2015). Indigenous people and mobile technologies. Routledge.
Eghenter, C., & Sellato, B. (1999). Kebudayaan dan Pelestarian Alam: Penelitian Interdisipliner di Pedalaman Kalimantan. Jakarta: WWF Indonesia.
lubis, Arief Fahmi. 2021. “Kedudukan Hukum Dari Hak Ulayat Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Pertahanan Negara Di Provinsi Papua Barat.” Esensi Hukum 3(2):170–87.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books.
Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (2012). Digital anthropology. Berg.
Hutchinson, S. E. (2006). Nuer dilemmas: Coping with money, war, and the state. University of California Press.
Kissya, E. (1993). Sasi Aman Haru-Ukui: Tradisi Kelola Sumberdaya Alam Lestari di Haruku. Jakarta: Yayasan Sejati.
Merry, S. E. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Semali, L. M., & Kincheloe, J. L. (1999). What is indigenous knowledge?: Voices from the academy. Routledge.
Tyson, A. D. (2010). Decentralization and adat revivalism in Indonesia: The politics of becoming indigenous. Routledge.
Windia, W., & Dewi, R. K. (2011). Analisis Bisnis yang Berlandaskan Tri Hita Karana. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.
Zeppel, H. (2006). Indigenous ecotourism: Sustainable development and management. Cabi.
https://www.dw.com/id/tradisi-smong-yang-selamatkan-warga-simeulue-dari-tsunami/a-67803358
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arief Fahmi Lubis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
