The Implementation of Virtual Laboratory LabVIEW in Enhancing Learning Analytics Skills, Motivation, and Conceptual Understanding of FT UNM Students

Sapto Haryoko; Hendra Jaya; Mantasia; Edy Sabara; Badaruddin  Anwar; Mahdinul Bahar

doi:10.59890/ijatss.v3i3.487

Authors

Sapto Haryoko Universitas Negeri Makassar
Hendra Jaya Universitas Negeri Makassar
Mantasia Universitas Negeri Makassar
Edy Sabara Universitas Negeri Makassar
Badaruddin Anwar Universitas Negeri Makassar
Mahdinul Bahar Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijatss.v3i3.487

Keywords:

Virtual Laboratory, LabVIEW, Learning Motivation, Conceptual Understanding, Technical Education

Abstract

The increasing demand for effective learning methods in technical education has highlighted the importance of innovative approaches to enhance students' learning motivation and conceptual understanding. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of LabVIEW-based virtual laboratories in improving learning outcomes among students at the Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM). A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving pre-test and post-test assessments to measure students' learning motivation and conceptual understanding before and after engaging with the LabVIEW virtual laboratory. The findings reveal that the utilization of LabVIEW significantly enhances students' motivation and comprehension of engineering concepts. Virtual laboratories provide a more interactive and flexible learning environment, allowing students to conduct experiments independently and gain immediate feedback. Additionally, LabVIEW simulations bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, fostering a deeper understanding of complex engineering principles. This study concludes that LabVIEW-based virtual laboratories are effective pedagogical tools that offer substantial benefits in improving students’ motivation and conceptual understanding. Future research should explore the broader applicability of virtual laboratories across various engineering disciplines and their long-term impact on learning outcomes

References

Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. (2013). Developing the TriLab, a triple access mode (hands‐on, virtual, remote) laboratory, of a process control rig using LabVIEW and Joomla. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 21, 614-626. DOI: 10.1002/cae.20506

Akar, A., & Yayla, A. (2011). Web Based Real Time Laboratory Applications of Analog and Digital Communication Courses with LabVIEW Access. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 1, 1209-1213. https://doi.org/10.5772/13800.

Anderson, C. A. (2009). Virtual laboratories and simulations in teaching and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(2), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-4

Basher, H., & Isa, S. (2006). On-Campus and Online Virtual Laboratory Experiments with LabVIEW. Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2006, 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1109/SECOND.2006.1629372.

Beers, G. W. (2005). The effect of teaching method on objective test scores: problem-based learning versus lecture. The Journal of Nursing Education, 44(7), 305-309.

Chao-Yang, W. (2012). Design and Implementation of the Virtual Experiment Based on LabVIEW. Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology.

Clayton, K., Blumberg, F. C., & Auld, D. P. (2010). The relationship between motivation, learning strategies, and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 349-364.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Donose, C., Schreiner, C., & Macovei, S. (2018). Using the Virtual Online Laboratories for the pre-University. 2018 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical And Power Engineering (EPE), 0609-0613. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPE.2018.8559617.

Doucet, M., Vrins, A., & Harvey, D. (2009). Effect of using an audience response system on learning environment, motivation, and long-term retention, during case-discussions in a large group of undergraduate veterinary clinical pharmacology students. Medical Teacher, 31(6), e570-e579.

Flynn, A.E., Klein, J.D. The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. ETR&D 49, 71–86 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504916

Hermono, F., & Hakim, F. N. (2013). Perancangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Multimedia (Studi Kasus Mata Pelajaran Ipa Bahasan Gerak Benda Kelas III SDN Dempelrejo). SPEED, 4(1). DOI: 10.3112/SPEED.V4I1.1162

Iqbal, M., Kiran, P., Kumar, J., Shree, K., Bhuvan, D., & Shakthivel, R. (2019). LabVIEW-Based Virtual Laboratories for Electrical Engineering Education with Real-Time Implementation. , 531-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2475-2_49.

Jabbar, R., Junaid, M., Masood, M., Mansoor, M., & Iftkhar, A. (2010). LabVIEW based induction machines laboratory for engineering education. , 71-76.

Kurniawan, Y., & Supriyanto, S. (2020). Motivational improvement of engineering students in virtual laboratory learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 221-234.

Liu, Z., et al. (2019). Enhancing technical and problem-solving skills with LabVIEW in higher education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(1), 88-101.

Makransky, G., Mayer, R. E., Veitch, N., Hood, M., Christensen, K. B., & Gadegaard, H. (2019). Equivalence of using a desktop virtual reality science simulation at home and in class. PLoS ONE, 14(4), e0214944. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214944

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172765

Moazami, F., Bahrampour, E., Azar, M., Jahedi, F., & Moattari, M. (2014). Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 45.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Moudgalya, K., & Arora, I. (2010). A virtual laboratory for distance education. 2010 International Conference on Technology for Education, 190-193. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2010.5550036.

Murphy, P. K., Greene, J., Firetto, C. M., Li, M., Lobczowski, N. G., Duke, R. F., Wei, L., & Croninger, R. M. V. (2017). Exploring the influence of homogeneous versus heterogeneous grouping on students’ text-based discussions and comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 336-355. D

Nolen, S., & Koretsky, M. (2018). Affordances of Virtual and Physical Laboratory Projects for Instructional Design: Impacts on Student Engagement. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61, 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2791445.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.

Qawaqneh, H., Ahmad, F., & Alawamreh, A. R. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence-based virtual laboratories on developing students' motivation towards learning mathematics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET).

Rahmiati, D. (2019). Implementation of Virtual Laboratory as Media in Elementary School Teacher Education Universitas Pasundan. International Journal of Science and Applied Science, 3(1), 1-8. DOI: 10.20961/ijsascs.v3i1.32440

Sellberg, C., Nazari, Z., & Solberg, M. (2024). Virtual Laboratories in STEM Higher Education: A Scoping Review. Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in Education, 1(1), 10-25. DOI: 10.16993/njsre.10

Siddiqui, A.A., Zia, M.I., Aamir, M., & Haque, S. (2002). Virtual Remote Electronic Laboratory. IEEE Students Conference, ISCON '02. Proceedings., 1, 94-98 vol.1.

Steidley, C., & Bachnak, R. (2005). Developing a prototype virtual laboratory for distance science and engineering education. 2005 6th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, T2B/1-T2B/4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2005.1560227.

Steidley, C., & Bachnak, R. (2005). Developing a prototype virtual laboratory for distance science and engineering education. 2005 6th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, T2B/1-T2B/4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2005.1560227

Sudarsih, A. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TPS (Think Pair Share) Terhadap Peningkatan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VI B SDN 19 Cakranegara. Reflection Journal. DOI: 10.36312/rj.v1i2.682

Susetyarini, R. E., Permana, T. I., Gunarta, G., Setyawan, D., Latifa, R., & Zaenab, S. (2019). Motivasi dan tanggung jawab siswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis proyek, sebuah penelitian tindakan kelas. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). DOI: 10.21831/JIPI.V5I1.22293

Tärnvik, A. (2007). Revival of the case method: a way to retain student-centred learning in a post-PBL era. Medical Teacher, 29(1), e32-e36.

Tiernan, P. (2010). Enhancing the learning experience of undergraduate technology students with LabVIEWTM software. Comput. Educ., 55, 1579-1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.001.

Tomandl, M., Mieling, T. B., Losert-Valiente Kroon, C. M., Hopf, M., & Arndt, M. (2015). Simulated Interactive Research Experiments as Educational Tools for Advanced Science. Scientific Reports, 5, Article 14108. DOI: 10.1038/srep14108

Van der Meijden, A., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2011). The effects of technology-supported learning on student motivation and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.2.d

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yi, Z., Jiang, J., & Fan, S. (2005). A LabVIEW-Based, Interactive Virtual Laboratory for Electronic Engineering Education

Zhou, J., et al. (2017). Conceptual understanding of physics principles using LabVIEW for virtual laboratories. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 7(4), 45-60.