Relevance of the Principle of Precaution in the Preparation of the Deed of Statement of Decisions of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (Egms) of Pt Nissihinkan Indonesia (Case Study ) Decision Court Tall Banten Number: 74/Pdt/2021/Pt. Btn )
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v3i1.189Keywords:
Notary, Deed of Statement of Meeting Decisions, Principle of PrudenceAbstract
A notary is a public official authorized by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. One of their responsibilities includes creating a Statement of Meeting Resolutions (PKR) based on the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS). This research examines the importance of a notary's adherence to the principle of prudence when drafting a PKR Deed based on fabricated meeting minutes, using Decision Number 74/PDT/2021/PT.BTN as a case study. The research employs a normative legal approach with a case study focus. The findings indicate that Lusi Indriani, SH, M.Kn, as a notary, violated procedural rules by failing to apply the principle of prudence. Consequently, the PKR deed number 01 she issued was deemed legally defective and annulled, along with its associated documents, resulting in Lusi receiving a written warning as a penalty.
References
ANANDA MUHAMAD TRI UTAMA. “APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF CAUTION IN MAKING A DEED OF POWER OF ATTORNEY TO SELL IN A LAND SALE AND PURCHASE BINDING AGREEMENT” 9 (2022): 356–63.
Ariesta Rahman, Fikri. “Implementation of the Notary's Principle of Caution in Recognizing Applicants.” Lex Renaissance Journal 3, no. 2 (2018): 423–40. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol3.iss2.art11.
BAMBANG RIANGGONO, SH. “THE FORCE OF STATEMENT DEED OF MEETING DECISION (PKR) MADE BASED ON MINUTES OF MEETING UNDER HAND REVIEWED FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE NOTARY.” Diponegoro University, 2008.
Dewantoro, Fara Deinara. “Notary’s Responsibility in Making a Deed of Statement of Meeting Decisions Based on Legally Defective Private Minutes (Study of District Court Decision Number 208/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Tjk).” Indonesian Notary 3, no. 3 (2021): 425–47.
Harahap, MY Civil Procedure Law Regarding Lawsuits, Trials, Confiscation, Evidence and Court Decisions . Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
Hendra, Rahmad. “Notary’s Responsibility for Authentic Deeds Whose Applicants Use Fake Identities in Pekanbaru City.” Journal of Legal Studies 3, no. 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v3i01.1029.
Liana, Devi, and Isabella Siagian. “CANCELLATION OF DEED OF STATEMENT OF EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND NOTARY’S RESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS THE EXTRAORDINARY SHAREHOLDERS’ DEED AND NOTARY’S RESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS THE CANCELED DEED (CASE STUDY OF SURABAYA HIGH COURT DECISION NUMBER 693/PDT/CANCELED” 2 (2020).
Ma, Umar, and Dony Wijaya. "LEGAL REVIEW OF THE POSITION AND FUNCTIONS OF A NOTARY AS A PUBLIC OFFICIAL IN MAKING AUTHENTIC DEEDS" II, no. 3 (2015): 299–309.
Thyawarta, Charlie, and Markoni. “Case Study of Notary’s Legal Liability in Making Authentic Deeds Reviewed from the Principle of Prudence.” Journal of Education and Teaching Review 7, no. 976 (2024): 1791–1800.
Wiweko, Bambang. “AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTARY IN PREPARING DEED OF MINUTES OF GMS IN DISPUTES OF UNLAWFUL ACTIONS RELATED TO IMTA (Case Study of District Court Decision No. 150/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Jkt. Pst).” Sangaji Journal of Sharia and Legal Thought 8, no. 1 (2024): 137–55.
