Implementation of Classic Management Theory in the Distribution of Duties and Authority in State Primary Schools 57/Ix Muaro Jambi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v3i2.314Keywords:
Implementation, Classical Management Theory, Division of Tasks and AuthorityAbstract
Based on the researcher's grand tour of the Muaro Jambi 57/IX Public Elementary School, it was found that first, management implementation was not in line with the division of duties and authority of teachers. Second, the principal only fulfills his obligations without exceeding limits. Third, the organization of time, work tools and facilities is not yet optimal. This qualitative research uses a qualitative case approach. The subjects of this research are elementary school principals. Data collection uses observation, interview and documentation techniques. Data analysis uses the Miles and Huberman model which includes data reduction, data presentation, and data withdrawal. The research results show that job satisfaction provides a clear sign in producing the Implementation of Classical Management Theory in the Division of Duties and Authority at the 57/IX Muaro Jambi State Elementary School. The feeling of satisfaction or happiness felt by the teacher has an impact on the quality of the performance provided. Teacher competency, which is reflected in the division of work, is clearly an important factor in producing job satisfaction which leads to the quality of performance produced. For leaders, it is very important to pay attention to job satisfaction in the division of tasks and authority in order to create high quality performance by increasing the competency of human resources (teachers) which is reflected in the division of work in accordance with the areas of expertise or abilities of human resources (teachers).
References
Agus Wibowo, (2013) Manajemen Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah,Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar,
Baharuddin dan Umiarso, (2012) Kepemimpinan Pendidikan Islam Antara Teori & Praktik, Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership (6th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bush, T. (2011). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Bush, T., Bell, L., & Middlewood, D. (2019). Principles of Educational Leadership and Management (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a Culture of Change (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Greenfield, W. D., & Ribbins, P. (2015). Educational Leadership: Personal Growth for Professional Development. London: Routledge.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Husaini Usman, (2013) Manajemen: Teori, Praktik, dan Riset Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
James A.F Stoner dan Charles Wankel, (1986) Management (Third Edition), (Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, N.J
Kompri, (2015) Manajemen Pendidikan, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Ngalim Purwanto, (2008) Administrasi dan Supervisi Pendidikan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Novan Ardy Wiyani, (2018) Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Total Quality Management: Konsep & Aplikasi di Sekolah, Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media,
Owens, R. G., & Valesky, T. C. (2015). Organizational Behavior in Education: Leadership and School Reform (11th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Prim Masrokan Mutohar, (2013) Manajemen Mutu Sekolah: Strategi Peningkatan Mutu dan Daya Saing Lembaga Pendidikan Islam, Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2013). Leadership: What's in It for Schools London: Routledge.
Stephen P. Robbins dan Mary Coulter, (2012) Management th ed, (New Jersey: Publishing as Prentice Hall, One Lake Street
Suharsimi Arikunto dan Lia Yuliana, (2021) Manajemen Pendidikan, Yogyakarta: Aditya Media,



